Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Is Atheism Increasing at the Expense of Theism?

From Science and Religion Today

http://www.scienceandreligiontoday.com/2012/05/30/is-atheism-increasing-at-the-expense-of-theism/

Is Atheism Increasing at the Expense of Theism?

From Gregory Paul, an independent paleontologist and researcher who examines the relationship between religion and society:
In recent years, there has been lots of discussion and debate about whether atheism or theism is on the rise around the world. A good deal of the answer can be found in results from the International Social Survey Program. In its Religion II survey conducted in 1998 and Religion III survey sampled in 2008 and just released (why the ISSP is so tardy in releasing its results is obscure), the ISSP asked the same set of questions in 28 countries, allowing assessment of gross longitudinal trends over a decade (because their Religion 1 poll in 1991 asked different questions in far fewer countries, it is not very longitudinally useful).

% Don’t believe in God % Theists overall % No doubt God exists

1998           2008 1998          2008 1998           2008
Great Britain 9.6              17.7 46.2           36 22.5            16.8
Austria 6.8              9.3 51.3           40.8 32.4            20.8
Netherlands 17.2            19.8 44.2           36.7 26.4            21.1
Australia 10.2            15.6 52.2           43.5 28.6            25.1
Norway 11.7            17.7 42.5           37 18.4            15
Ireland 2.4              4 77.3           67.5 49.8            45.1
New Zealand 7.9              12.5 52.9           46.4 30.9            28.2
Spain 8.6              9.7 64.7           59.5 45.8            39.2
Italy 4.1              5.3 73.5           69.5 48               42.9
Sweden 16.8            19.5 25.8           24.9 12.3            10.3
France 19.1            21.9 38.8           37.3 20.1            17.5
Denmark 14.7            18.4 34              33.4 13.6            13.4
United States 3.2              2.8 77.5           78.2 62.8            61.3
Switzerland 4.3              8.5 44.5           45.1 28.3            28.8
Germany west 12.1            10.5 41.3           48.1 23.4            27.2
Germany east 54               53 15.7           16.5 9.4              8
Japan 10.6            8.7 13.2           16.4 4                 4.4

Northern Ireland 3.7              6.8 74.4           67.4 50               45.2
Portugal 1.9              4 84.8           72.9 60               54.4




Czech Republic 20.3            37.3 30.4           23.9 17.1            23.9
Hungary 12.8            15.3 51.6           42.4 31.1            23.2
Latvia 9.2              18.3 38.9           36.9 22.9            21.7
Poland 2.4              3.3 81             76.4 70.5            62.9
Russia 19.7            6.1 40.2           58.2 23.8            33.9
Slovakia 11.1            10.4 56.7           59.8 40.8            41.6
Slovenia 14.2            13.6 39.4           40.7 22.9            24.2




Chile 1.5              1.7 91.4           90.5 81.4            82.3
Cyprus 1.6              1.9 84.8           70.2 65               59
Philippines 0.7              0.8 82.3           92.5 79               82.7
(Note: Bold lines indicate an increase in atheism. First World countries are ordered starting with largest decrease in overall theists and progressing downward.)
A complaint I have about the new ISSP survey is that it failed to requery on opinion on the Bible in a large number of countries, including the United States (!), leaving us unable to reaffirm the Gallup record of a strong long-term decline in American biblical literalism. Nor did it repeat the question on regular attendance at religious services, another serious loss of longitudinal sampling that will hopefully be corrected in 2018.
Because there are only two samples, at each end of the 10 years, the trends for a given country must be taken with a dose of demographic salt, especially when the difference is not statistically significant. Even what looks like a major shift in a particular nation may be a statistical fluke. If there were no general overall pattern apparent, there would be little change to report.

Of the 28 countries sampled, in 20 of them theism is recorded as losing ground to atheism, by at least some degree, going from 1998 to 2008. This is mainly because this pattern is observed in 12 of the 16 First World democracies.

(Note: These are predominantly ISSP results. Solid lines indicate atheists from absolutist to marginal, empty spaces to the right are theists from marginal to absolutist, and results for western and eastern Germany are combined proportional to their populations. Differences between the 1998 and 2008 ISSP results are indicated by dashed segments.)
Of the 27 nations measured on belief in an afterlife, 22 showed a decrease, including all but one First World country, with the added proviso that the eastern part of Germany did not. In 20 of 28 countries, the number of those who never pray went up, including 13 of the 16 most prosperous countries. Atheism of at least some degree was a majority in nine developed countries prior to the turn of the century; a decade later, this was true in 12. In 1998, disbelief in theoimmortality was the majority opinion in one First World nation; in 2008, it was so in five. Never praying remains the majority practice in one.
The preponderance of these trends, separately and collectively, indicates that they are real—in which case, religiosity is losing popularity at large. If anything, the general trend is probably even stronger, particularly in the developed democracies. In only one First World case, western Germany, is a marked shift toward theism recorded, and this could be a statistical blip—other reports of a rise in Germotheism have not been appearing, and belief in living forever has not risen. Also, a slight move toward theism in eastern Germany may reflect an influx of more theistic western Germans into the region. The theistic turn in Japan is not statistically significant in most queries and very possibly errant in view of the absence of reports of a religious revival. The situation is muddled in Switzerland, where the rise in theism is statistically marginal, while strong atheists are recorded as rising, as life after death and prayer drop more sharply than seems realistic. And Euro-Islam is not stemming the tide of secularization. Over the 10 years between the surveys, western Europe saw a gain of more than 20 million new atheists that now total more than 200 million out of a general population of nearly 400 million; so atheists are the majority in western Europe.
The ISSP did not find a shift in the United States—an anomaly compared with the results emerging from other surveys (as I discuss in more detail here, which is a supplement to this article). Gallup recently found that the “no” response to the simple query on belief in God is currently four times higher than when it was last asked in the 1960s. The percentage of “no” responses to similar Gallup questions on God belief leave no doubt that (despite low rates of reproduction) atheism has persistently risen, making nontheists the main component of the well-documented rise of the nonreligious (rather than an increase in unchurched theists). No significant Amerofaith is expanding anywhere so fast. Even the (fast-breeding) Mormons are being left in the demographic dust.
It appears that Ameroatheists have expanded by 10 million since the turn of the century—representing about a million a year, and about a third of overall population growth, to a total of 60 million out of more than 300 million. Atheism has made large gains among the young, while congregation size has dropped by as much as a fifth. Even so, the ISSP results confirm that the United States is still the most theistic prosperous democracy—yet not nearly as theistic as some Second and Third World countries.
A multinational waxing of atheism and waning of theism seems to be occurring, and may well be universal in Western countries. The increase in Western atheism appears to be continuing a long-term trend that probably started in the 1800s, if not earlier, and has accelerated since World War II with no signs of slowing down, if the ISSP results are correct. Losses in theism have occurred in both Protestant and Catholic nations, albeit with the latter somewhat more resistant to losses. In most Western nations, the religious right is already weak, and in the few where it is a strong minority, it is losing ground. Demographically driven by a growing loss of piety among youth, the rise of secularism in the advanced democracies is in accord with the socioeconomic dysfunctionality hypothesis that predicts and observes that improving levels of financial and economic security in middle class majorities strongly suppresses interest in supernatural deities.
If the ISSP results are on target, then Northern Island has seen a marked decline in theism since the end of sectarian strife. The same has occurred in Portugal, although the doubling of disbelief in supernatural immortality cannot be real. These trends are also in line with the thesis that increasing security is detrimental to the popularity of religion.
In most former Eastern bloc countries sampled by the ISSP, theism is suffering, or at best holding its own. The religious declines in the Czech Republic and Hungary may be exaggerated by a degree of statistical randomness, but even so, are remarkable. The slippage of Catholicism in Poland must be especially galling to the Vatican considering the efforts that Pope John Paul II put into aiding the defeat of atheistic communism via support for Solidarity, a project intended to revive Christianity in Europe. That obviously did not work out. There is no statistical significance to the trends recorded by the ISSP in Slovakia and Slovenia. The lack of a religious revival in so many formerly communist nations belies the wide belief that the removal of atheocommunist indoctrination has resulted in the automatic revival of religiosity.
Russia looks like a former Eastern bloc county that is undergoing a religious revitalization. It is improbable that the rise of theism at the expense of atheism can be so dramatic as measured by the ISSP over such a short time, but the basic trend cannot be rejected out of hand. Although some elevation of theism is plausible in view of the theistic orientation of the current regime, the result is somewhat surprising since other accounts have observed a retention of substantial irreligiosity. On the other hand, a return to worship of a god in a traumatized autocratic country where lifespans are declining is compatible with the psychosociological prediction that religion is most able to thrive in seriously dysfunctional societies. The dramatic increase in praying fits with this theory. That support for the belief in an afterlife, which is a marker of serious belief in a heavenly deity, has not risen all that much suggests that much of the rise of Russoreligosity is in many cases a nationalist trend in support of the regime-backed Russian Orthodox Church than actual supernaturalism. It will be interesting to see if future polling confirms the trend.
There is no observed trend in Catholic Chile, where the recent president was openly atheistic. According to the ISSP, Cyprus is experiencing considerable secularization, and my information on this island is too limited to state whether this is plausible or why it may be occurring. Nor do I have sufficient information to comment on the apparent rise of Philippine theism—perhaps Catholic and very possibly involving Islamic fundamentalism—except to caution that polling in impoverished Second World countries can be unreliable for technical reasons.
The thesis that popular secularism is dead, or at least dying, is clearly false. In the most advanced and successful nations, it is religion that is in the demographic ICU. Also entirely discredited is the premise that religion is universal to the human condition, like language—while theists vary from constituting nearly entire populations to less than a third, verbal skills are nearly uniform across the board. Demographic extrapolations that suggest fast-reproducing fundamentalists are on a statistical course to outgrow low-fertility secularists are proving flawed because they fail to account for mass nonchalant conversion due to modernity.
Churches lack mechanisms to resist the secularization forces of hip modernity—including the cash-flush corporations that are in competition with churches for the attention and time of the population (check out the parking lots of Walmart and Home Depot on a Sunday morning, when only a quarter or less of Americans attend church). Meanwhile, atheism is organically expanding via spontaneous conversion with little organized effort by dedicated advocates. Thus, we can conclude that atheism is not fighting a desperate battle against a rising tide of organized religion in the West, and theists should be gravely concerned about their situation in many countries, especially the most successful societies, since the rise of atheism is predominant among Western youth, and largely casual atheism predominates when democratic societies are at their most successful.

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Where Is God? Where Is He Not...?

by Rev. Gregory "Doc" Lowrey
Happy Sunday.

Today I gave in (got sucked in) to a discussion presented on Linked-In titled:
Where Is God? Where Is He Not...? 
Many views were presented and it was obvious that the participants had all spent a lot of energy and concern with this issue of "understanding" God and determining if we are collectively God or individuals with our own thoughts and powers of self-determination.

If you would like to consider the conversation you can find it here: http://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&gid=1437977&type=member&item=115060458&report.success=Tj8fJnK62GOU9jIFdRRZ-uJ21Ua1K69XF6XJ24FUowP1Q6iOAj_JytVeP7141jKoFHbECgNULh4dKgM5922xwphYoiFzZgLoXzigjsFUqQP1Q3npf6B26XPRL7AdKgLX4C92j0PRoWkFbdGXFjkETtPa1WcFKTnOlHbNjC1aqaRlQ6XflzweyASC1h0qQl5flADNabsU-pc

(you may have to join the group to read this.  I really know little about Linked-In and rarely participate)

My personal contribution to the discussion was this:

It seems to me ridiculous to imagine a creator so insecure that [he] needs to be understood/known by it's creation. 
Why waste energy on an impossible task?
That we exist is our perception as is also the perception that something created us, perhaps intentionally.
Perhaps no intention exists at all - except in our perception. 
[perception, especially from a biological (humans as amalgamated operatives of bacterial colonies for example) perspective, might only be a perception itself - not a reality!]
We all perceive individually and as groups [certain] needs, fears and desires. 
If we use the intellect/inspiration/intuition/experience that we all feel we have, to address those issues in a manner that allows us to best enjoy and achieve our perception of our personal and group potential, what more can we ask! 
Perhaps meditating on the mysteries of consciousness serves some personal need or perhaps it is an open-ended exercise that only distracts us from being the thing we were created to be. 
Should we aspire to be more than what we were made to be?  If we believe in intentional creation - probably we should not. 
Should a rock aspire to be a cloud? 
Likewise, if we believe in a non-intentional creation, why would we aspire to be something other than what we are. 
Cause produces effect. 
To me, discovering methods of action (or inaction if you prefer) that are most likely to produce our desired effect is the only issue that should occupy us. 
Once we have discovered a method that satisfies us, there is not much else to consider - but only to experience (and some of us hope - enjoy). 
All else can never go beyond endless, unprovable speculation. 
To me, in my desire to achieve what I consider a positive result from my perception (though often only a hope) of a reciprocal nature of existence, is to embrace the golden rule and an aspiration to apply it in all my action and thought. 
Other phenomena we may perceive to exist, but where is value beyond accepting that it to us exists and utilizing our perception to achieve our desires, obtain our needs and calm our fears. 
Our observation can lead us to accept our condition. 
Some people need more observation to accept their nature (such as to comprehend universal thought or that we are a consortium of colonies of competing and cooperating micro-energies that control our thought and action), while others may simply need to see a cloud or a seed (to watch the grass grow) to come to the same sense of what is self and purpose. 
We may or may not actually have "free-will" and "self-determination", but if we perform according to what we do believe in a manner that we would consider true to our self perception we will (I think) find satisfaction and an ability to accept all of the different conditions of experience without being confused, distracted or afraid.
If pondering the imponderable satisfies us, so be it. 
Likely we will at some time find it was only a step on our path and that taking the path was much more important to us than the actual objects of our inquiry.  (such as the existence, nature or interests of god)

Sunday, May 6, 2012

Vice President Biden Endorses Same-Sex Marriage

by Rev. Gregory "Doc" Lowrey

This morning on Meet the Press, the topic of Same-Sex Marriage was discussed.

Here is a short report on what was said. 

By Ryan Teague Beckwith  May 6, 2012

Vice President Joe Biden became the highest-ranking U.S. official to endorse same-sex marriage this morning.
In a wide-ranging interview on “Meet the Press,” Biden said he has no problem with gays and lesbians having marriage rights.
“The president sets the policy. I am absolutely comfortable with the fact that men marrying men, women marrying women and heterosexual men and women marrying one another are entitled to the same exact rights, all the civil rights, all the civil liberties,” Biden said, according to Reuters.
Biden did not say whether the White House would take concrete steps to help legalize gay marriage if President Obama wins a second term.
Obama has said his views on same-sex marriage are “evolving” and that it is a matter best left to the states.
Obama senior campaign adviser David Axelrod attempted to walk the statement back a little immediately after the interview aired.
On his personal Twitter account, Axelrod wrote that what Biden said “that all married couples should have exactly the same legal rights” is “precisely” the position of Obama.

                                                                .................................................................................

I was stunned to see this interview which I had just watched immediately reported on Facebook with comments almost all devoted to VP Biden being "No Longer Catholic" because he has reversed his stance on this issue of equality.

I felt obligated to respond and felt that this was a good issue to include on the UBU website.

The summary of the comments I respond to are basically that Biden has rejected his faith and that homosexuality is an affront to God.  A summary of my response is that God created homosexuals and we are not in a position to be critical of God or to second guess God's intentions.  We are all equal and of equal value to our creative force and should respect and honor that which God deemed appropriate to create.

The slightly longer version follows:

Perhaps VP Biden's perspective has matured and he has seen that being Human is more fundamental than being "Catholic". I suppose that most people who believe in [a] God, believe that all people are God's creation. Who is the creature to question their creator or to demean or otherwise attempt to judge the value of that which their God creates? We are all children of the same Creator. Maybe all the "Catholics" and other so called "Christians" ought to read the book they claim validates their belief.

1 Corinthians 12:12-27 (KJV)

12 For ... the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body..

13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; [gay or straight] and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.

14 For the body is not one member, but many.

17 If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where were the smelling?

18 But now hath God set the members every one of them in the body, as it hath pleased him.

20 But now are they many members, yet but one body.

21 And the eye cannot say unto the hand, I have no need of thee: nor again the head to the feet, I have no need of you.

22 Nay, much more those members of the body, which seem to be more feeble, are necessary:

23 And those members of the body, which we think to be less honourable, upon these we bestow more abundant honour; and our uncomely parts have more abundant comeliness.

24 For our comely parts have no need: but God hath tempered the body together, having given more abundant honour to that part which lacked.

25 That there should be no schism in the body; but that the members should have the same care one for another.

26 And whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it; or one member be honoured, all the members rejoice with it.

That we are all created by God for God's purposes should to believers be beyond dispute. To argue for the value of one element of God's creation over another only shows the person who would demean that which God created to be the "more feeble", "less honourable", "uncomely" parts for which the rest of us need to care for in their spiritual weakness and ignorance. Whether you believe in "God" or not, we are all creations of the same elemental force and are thus all equal and all created with equal value, unless we choose to diminish our own value by despising equality. Accept Equality and "rejoice with it."!


I know that some people will be offended that I have included "all creation" in this description rather than contending that "the body" "of Christ" means only "the christian church".  However, Jesus claimed that we are all children of the same God and nearly all "christians" claim that Jesus is God.  If we accept that, then "the church" would be the church of God, not the church of Christ and all people of every faith (or non-faith if that is possible) would be members equally in that body.

Additionally, if we accept that this speaks to the "body" or church of Christ, and we relate "Christ" to Jesus, then we have to accept that Jesus taught that we are all equal in our value to God and that the "members" of christ's church are who accept his teachings and the members of the "body of Christ" are all people regardless of what particular belief they embrace.


I do not accept that this teaching is confined to "members only" of a certain denomination but applies equally to all, plants, animals and minerals included.  Oh, and gay people too!